|
"We the people, in order to form a more perfect union."
Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a hall that still stands across
the street, a group of
men
gathered and, with these simple words, launched America's improbable
experiment in democracy. Farmers and scholars; statesmen and patriots
who had traveled across an ocean to escape tyranny and persecution
finally made real their declaration of independence at a Philadelphia
convention that lasted through the spring of 1787.
The document they produced was eventually signed but ultimately
unfinished.
It was stained by this nation's original sin of slavery,
a question that divided the colonies and brought the convention to a
stalemate until the founders chose to allow the slave trade to continue
for at least twenty more years, and to leave any final resolution to
future generations.
Of course, the answer to the slavery question was already embedded
within our Constitution - a Constitution that had at is very core the
ideal of
equal citizenship
under the law; a Constitution that promised its people liberty, and
justice, and a union that could be and should be perfected over time.
And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from
bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full
rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. What would be
needed were
Americans
in successive generations who were willing to do their part - through
protests and struggle, on the streets and in the courts, through a civil
war and civil disobedience and always at great risk - to narrow that gap
between the promise of our ideals and the reality of their time.
This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this campaign
- to continue the long march of those who came before us, a march for a
more just, more equal, more free, more caring and more prosperous
America. I chose to run for the presidency at this moment in history
because I believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of our time
unless we
solve them together
- unless we
perfect our union
by understanding that we may have different stories, but we hold
common hopes;
that we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same
place, but we all want
to move in the same direction
-
towards a better future for our children
and our grandchildren.
This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity
of the
American people.
But it also comes from my own American story.
I am the son of a
black man
from Kenya and a
white woman
from Kansas. I was raised with the help of a
white grandfather
who survived a Depression to serve in Patton's Army during World War II
and a
white grandmother
who worked on a bomber assembly line at Fort Leavenworth while he was
overseas. I've gone to some of the best schools in America and lived in
one of the world's poorest nations. I am married to a
black
American who
carries within her the blood of slaves and slaveowners - an inheritance
we pass on to our two precious daughters. I have brothers, sisters,
nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every race and every hue,
scattered across three continents, and for as long as I live, I will
never forget that in no other country on Earth is my story even
possible.
It's a story that hasn't made me the most conventional candidate. But it
is a story that has seared into my genetic makeup the idea that this
nation is more than the sum of its parts - that out of many, we are
truly one.
Throughout the first year of this campaign, against all predictions to
the contrary, we saw how hungry the American people were for this
message of unity. Despite the
temptation to view my candidacy through a purely racial lens,
we won commanding victories in states with some of the
whitest populations
in the country. In South Carolina, where the Confederate Flag still
flies, we built a powerful coalition of
African Americans
and
white Americans.
This is not to say that race has not been an issue in the campaign. At
various stages in the campaign, some commentators have deemed me either
"too
black"
or "not
black
enough." We saw racial tensions bubble to the surface during the week
before the South Carolina primary. The press has scoured every exit poll
for the latest evidence of racial polarization, not just in terms of
white and black,
but
black and brown
as well.
And yet, it has only been in the last couple of weeks that the
discussion of race in this campaign has taken a particularly divisive
turn.
On one end of the spectrum, we've heard the implication that my
candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it's based
solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial
reconciliation on the cheap. On the other end, we've heard my former
pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express
views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but
views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation;
that rightly offend
white and black
alike.
I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of
Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging
questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of
American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him
make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in
church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views?
Absolutely - just as I'm sure many of you have heard remarks from your
pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.
But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren't simply
controversial. They weren't simply a religious leader's effort to speak
out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a
profoundly distorted view of this country
- a view that sees
white racism
as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that
we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the
Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like
Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of
radical Islam.
As such, Reverend Wright's comments were not only wrong but divisive,
divisive at a time when we need
unity;
racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set
of monumental problems - two wars, a terrorist threat, a falling
economy, a chronic health care crisis and potentially devastating
climate change; problems that are
neither black or white
or Latino or Asian, but rather problems that confront us all.
Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals,
there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are
not enough. Why associate myself with Reverend Wright in the first
place, they may ask? Why not join another church? And I confess that if
all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons
that have run in an endless loop on the television and You Tube, or if
Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being
peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in
much the same way
But the truth is, that isn't all that I know of the man. The man I met
more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my
Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one
another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor. He is a man who
served his country as a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at
some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country, and who
for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing
God's work here on Earth - by housing the homeless, ministering to the
needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison
ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS.
In my first book, Dreams From My Father, I described the experience of
my first service at Trinity:
"People began to shout, to rise from their seats and clap and cry out, a
forceful wind carrying the reverend's voice up into the rafters....And
in that single note - hope! - I heard something else; at the foot of
that cross, inside the thousands of churches across the city, I imagined
the stories of ordinary
black
people merging with the stories of David and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh,
the Christians in the lion's den, Ezekiel's field of dry bones. Those
stories - of survival, and freedom, and hope - became our story, my
story; the blood that had spilled was our blood, the tears our tears;
until this
black
church, on this bright day, seemed once more a vessel carrying the story
of a people into future generations and into a larger world. Our trials
and triumphs became at once unique and universal,
black and more than black;
in chronicling our journey, the stories and songs gave us a means to
reclaim memories that we didn't need to feel shame about...memories that
all people might study and cherish - and with which we could start to
rebuild."
That has been my experience at Trinity. Like other predominantly
black
churches across the country, Trinity embodies the
black community in its
entirety - the doctor and the welfare mom, the model student and the
former gang-banger. Like other
black churches, Trinity's services are
full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor. They are full of
dancing, clapping, screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the
untrained ear. The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the
fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and
successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the
black experience in America.
And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Reverend Wright.
As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He
strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children.
Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any
ethnic group in derogatory terms,
or treat whites with whom he interacted
with anything but courtesy and respect. He contains within him the
contradictions - the good and the bad - of the community that he has
served diligently for so many years.
I can no more disown him than I can disown the
black community.
I can no more disown him than I can my
white grandmother
- a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again
for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this
world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of
black men
who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has
uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.
These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this
country that I love.
Some will see this as an attempt to justify or excuse comments that are
simply inexcusable. I can assure you it is not. I suppose the
politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just
hope that it fades into the woodwork. We can dismiss Reverend Wright as
a crank or a demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine Ferraro,
in the aftermath of her recent statements, as harboring some deep-seated
racial bias.
But race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore
right now. We would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made
in his offending sermons about America - to simplify and stereotype and
amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality.
The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that
have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race
in this country that we've never really worked through - a part of our
union that we have yet to perfect. And if we walk away now, if we simply
retreat into our respective corners, we will never be able to come
together and solve challenges like health care, or education, or the
need to find good jobs for every American.
Understanding this reality requires a reminder of how we arrived at this
point. As William Faulkner once wrote, "The past isn't dead and buried.
In fact, it isn't even past." We do not need to recite here the history
of racial injustice in this country. But we do need to remind ourselves
that so many of the disparities that exist in the
African-American
community today can be directly traced to inequalities passed on from an
earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and
Jim Crow.
Segregated schools were, and are, inferior schools; we still haven't
fixed them, fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education, and the
inferior education they provided, then and now, helps explain the
pervasive achievement gap between today's
black and white
students.
Legalized discrimination - where
blacks
were prevented, often through violence, from owning property, or loans
were not granted to
African-American business owners,
or
black homeowners
could not access FHA mortgages, or
blacks
were excluded from unions, or the police force, or fire departments -
meant that
black families
could not amass any meaningful wealth to bequeath to future generations.
That history helps explain the wealth and income gap between
black and white,
and the concentrated pockets of poverty that persists in so many of
today's urban and rural communities.
A lack of economic opportunity among
black men,
and the shame and frustration that came from not being able to provide
for one's family, contributed to the erosion of
black families
- a problem that welfare policies for many years may have worsened. And
the lack of basic services in so many urban
black neighborhoods -
parks for kids to play in, police walking the beat, regular garbage
pick-up and building code enforcement - all helped create a cycle of
violence, blight and neglect that continue to haunt us.
This is the reality in which Reverend Wright and other
African-Americans
of his generation grew up. They came of age in the late fifties and
early sixties, a time when segregation was still the law of the land and
opportunity was systematically constricted. What's remarkable is not how
many failed in the face of discrimination, but rather how many
men and women overcame
the odds; how many were able to make a way out of no way for those like
me who would come after them.
But for all those who scratched and clawed their way to get a piece of
the American Dream, there were many who didn't make it - those who were
ultimately
defeated, in one way or another, by discrimination.
That legacy of defeat was passed on to future generations - those young
men and increasingly young women who we see standing on street corners
or languishing in our prisons, without hope or prospects for the future.
Even for those
blacks
who did make it, questions of race, and racism, continue to define their
worldview in fundamental ways. For the men and women of Reverend
Wright's generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have
not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years. That
anger may not get expressed in public, in front of
white co-workers or white friends.
But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table. At
times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along
racial lines, or to make up for a politician's own failings.
And occasionally it finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the
pulpit and in the pews. The fact that so many people are surprised to
hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright's sermons simply reminds us
of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs
on Sunday morning. That anger is not always productive; indeed, all too
often it distracts attention from solving real problems; it keeps us
from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition, and prevents
the
African-American community
from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change. But the
anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it
without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of
misunderstanding that exists between the races.
In fact, a similar anger exists within segments of the
white community.
Most working- and middle-class
white Americans
don't feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race.
Their experience is the immigrant experience - as far as they're
concerned, no one's handed them anything, they've built it from scratch.
They've worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs
shipped overseas or their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor. They
are anxious about their futures, and feel their dreams slipping away; in
an era of stagnant wages and global competition, opportunity comes to be
seen as a zero sum game, in which your dreams come at my expense. So
when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; when
they hear that an
African American
is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good
college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed;
when they're told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods
are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time.
Like the anger within the
black community,
these resentments aren't always expressed in polite company. But they
have helped shape the political landscape for at least a generation.
Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan
Coalition.
Politicians routinely exploited fears of crime for their own electoral
ends. Talk show hosts and conservative commentators built entire careers
unmasking bogus claims of racism while dismissing legitimate discussions
of racial injustice and inequality as mere political correctness or
reverse racism.
Just as
black anger
often proved counterproductive, so have these
white resentments
distracted attention from the
real culprits
of the middle class squeeze - a corporate culture rife with inside
dealing, questionable accounting practices, and short-term
greed;
a Washington dominated by lobbyists and special interests; economic
policies that favor the few over the many. And yet, to wish away the
resentments of
white Americans,
to label them as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are
grounded in legitimate concerns - this too widens the racial divide, and
blocks the path to understanding.
This is where we are right now. It's a
racial stalemate
we've been stuck in for years. Contrary to the claims of some of my
critics,
black and white,
I have never been so naïve as to believe that we can get beyond our
racial divisions in a single election cycle, or with a single candidacy
- particularly a candidacy as imperfect as my own.
But I have asserted a firm conviction - a conviction rooted in my faith
in God and my faith in the American people - that working together we
can move beyond some of our old racial wounds, and that in fact
we have no choice
if we are to continue on the path of a more perfect union.
For the
African-American community,
that path means embracing the burdens of our past without becoming
victims of our past. It means continuing to insist on a full measure of
justice in every aspect of American life. But it also means
binding our
particular grievances - for better health care, and better schools, and
better jobs -
to the larger aspirations of all Americans
-- the
white woman
struggling to break the glass ceiling, the
white man
whose been laid off, the immigrant trying to feed his family. And it
means taking full responsibility for own lives - by demanding more from
our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and reading to
them, and teaching them that while they may face challenges and
discrimination in their own lives, they must never succumb to despair or
cynicism; they must always believe that they can write their own
destiny.
Ironically, this quintessentially American - and yes, conservative -
notion of self-help found frequent expression in Reverend Wright's
sermons. But what my former pastor too often failed to understand is
that embarking on a program of self-help also requires a belief that
society can change.
The profound mistake of Reverend Wright's sermons is not that he spoke
about racism in our society. It's that he spoke as if our society was
static; as if no progress has been made; as if this country - a country
that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the
highest office in the land and build a coalition of
white and black;
Latino and Asian, rich and poor, young and old -- is still irrevocably
bound to a tragic past. But what we know -- what we have seen - is that
America can change.
That is true genius of this nation. What we have already achieved gives
us hope - the audacity to hope - for what we can and must achieve
tomorrow.
In the
white community,
the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the
African-American community
does not just exist in the minds of
black people;
that the legacy of discrimination - and current incidents of
discrimination, while less overt than in the past - are real and must be
addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds - by investing in our
schools and our communities; by enforcing our civil rights laws and
ensuring fairness in our criminal justice system; by providing this
generation with ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for
previous generations. It requires all Americans to realize that your
dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing
in the health, welfare, and education of
black and brown and white children
will ultimately help all of America prosper.
In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less,
than what all the world's great religions demand - that we do unto
others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother's keeper,
Scripture tells us. Let us be our sister's keeper. Let us find that
common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect
that spirit as well.
For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that
breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as
spectacle - as we did in the OJ trial - or in the wake of tragedy, as we
did in the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the nightly news. We
can play Reverend Wright's sermons on every channel, every day and talk
about them from now until the election, and make the only question in
this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow
believe or sympathize with his most offensive words. We can pounce on
some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she's playing the
race card, or we can speculate on whether
white men
will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his
policies.
We can do that.
But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we'll be talking
about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another
one. And nothing will change.
That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come
together and say, "Not this time." This time we want to talk about the
crumbling schools that are stealing the future of
black children and white children and Asian children and Hispanic
children and Native American children.
This time we want to reject the cynicism that tells us that these kids
can't learn; that those kids who don't look like us are somebody else's
problem. The children of America are not those kids, they are our kids,
and we will not let them fall behind in a 21st century economy. Not this
time.
This time we want to talk about how the lines in the Emergency Room are
filled with
whites and blacks
and
Hispanics
who do not have health care; who don't have the power on their own to
overcome the special interests in Washington, but who can take them on
if we do it together.
This time we want to talk about the shuttered mills that once provided a
decent life for men and women of every race, and the homes for sale that
once belonged to Americans from every religion, every region, every walk
of life. This time we want to talk about the fact that the real problem
is not that someone who doesn't look like you might take your job; it's
that the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more
than a profit.
This time we want to talk about the men and women of
every color and creed
who serve together, and fight together, and bleed together under the
same proud flag. We want to talk about how to bring them home from a war
that never should've been authorized and never should've been waged, and
we want to talk about how we'll show our patriotism by caring for them,
and their families, and giving them the benefits they have earned.
I would not be running for President if I didn't believe with all my
heart that this is what the vast majority of Americans want for this
country. This union may never be perfect, but generation after
generation has shown that it
can always be perfected.
And today, whenever I find myself feeling doubtful or cynical about this
possibility, what gives me the most hope is the next generation - the
young people whose attitudes and beliefs and openness to change have
already made history in this election.
There is one story in particularly that I'd like to leave you with today
- a story I told when I had the great honor of speaking on Dr. King's
birthday at his home church, Ebenezer Baptist, in Atlanta.
There is a young, twenty-three year old white woman named Ashley
Baia who organized for our campaign in Florence, South Carolina. She had
been working to organize a mostly
African-American community
since the beginning of this campaign, and one day she was at a
roundtable discussion where everyone went around telling their story and
why they were there.
And Ashley said that when she was nine years old, her mother got cancer.
And because she had to miss days of work, she was let go and lost her
health care. They had to file for bankruptcy, and that's when Ashley
decided that she had to do something to help her mom.
She knew that food was one of their most expensive costs, and so Ashley
convinced her mother that what she really liked and really wanted to eat
more than anything else was mustard and relish sandwiches. Because that
was the cheapest way to eat.
She did this for a year until her mom got better, and she told everyone
at the roundtable that the reason she joined our campaign was so that
she could help the millions of other children in the country who want
and need to help their parents too.
Now Ashley might have made a different choice. Perhaps somebody told her
along the way that the source of her mother's problems were
blacks
who were on welfare and too lazy to work, or
Hispanics
who were coming into the country illegally. But she didn't. She sought
out allies in her fight against injustice.
Anyway, Ashley finishes her story and then goes around the room and asks
everyone else why they're supporting the campaign. They all have
different stories and reasons. Many bring up a specific issue. And
finally they come to this elderly
black man
who's been sitting there quietly the entire time. And Ashley asks him
why he's there. And he does not bring up a specific issue. He does not
say health care or the economy. He does not say education or the war. He
does not say that he was there because of Barack Obama. He simply says
to everyone in the room, "I am here because of Ashley."
"I'm here because of Ashley." By itself, that single moment of
recognition between that
young white girl
and that
old black man
is not enough. It is not enough to give health care to the sick, or jobs
to the jobless, or education to our children.
But it is where we start. It is where our union grows stronger. And as
so many generations have come to realize over the course of the
two-hundred and twenty one years since a band of patriots signed that
document in Philadelphia, that is where the perfection begins.
|
|
|
"We the people, in order to form a more perfect union."
Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a hall that still stands across
the street, a group of
EuAm
men
gathered and, with these simple words, launched America's improbable
experiment in democracy.
EuAm
farmers and scholars; statesmen and
patriots who had traveled across an ocean to escape tyranny and
persecution finally made real their declaration of independence at a
Philadelphia convention that lasted through the spring of 1787.
The document they produced was eventually signed but ultimately
unfinished.
It was stained by the similar migration from Africa of slavery,
not accepted by all
EuAm
but a fact of "life" among the colonies to
continue for at least twenty more years, until more aggressively
challenged by some
EuAm
in future generations.
Of course, the answer to the slavery question was already embedded
within our Constitution - a Constitution that had at its very core the
ideal of
equal citizenship
under the law; a Constitution that promised its people liberty, and
justice, and a union that could be and should be perfected over time.
And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from
bondage, or provide men and women of every origin and status their full
rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. What would be
needed were
Americans
in successive generations who were willing to do their part - through
protests and struggle, on the streets and in the courts, through a civil
war and civil disobedience and always at great risk - to narrow that gap
between the promise of our ideals and the reality of their time.
This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this Obama
campaign - to continue the long march of those who came before us, a
march for a more just, more equal, more free, more caring and more
prosperous America. I chose to run for the presidency at this moment in
history because I believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of
our time unless we
solve them together
- unless we
perfect our union
by understanding that we may have different stories, but we hold
common hopes;
that we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same
place, but we all want
to move in the same direction
-
towards a better future for our children
and our grandchildren.
This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity
of the
American people.
But it also comes from my own American story.
I am the son of a
man from Kenya
and a
woman
from Kansas.
I was raised with the help of
her
Father,
my
grandFather,
who survived a Depression to serve in Patton's Army during World War II,
and his
wife, my
grandMother,
who worked on a bomber assembly line at Fort Leavenworth while her
man
was overseas. I've excelled at some of the best schools in America and lived
in one of the world's poorest nations. I am married to an African
American who carries within her the blood of slaves and slaveowners - an
inheritance we pass on to our two precious daughters. I have brothers,
sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every race and every
hue, scattered across three continents, and for as long as I live,
I am
ever cognizant that my proximity to leading the World is exquisite
testimony of the essential greatness of America the beautiful.
It is a story of the improbable candidate obtaining from his improbable
genetic makeup rising to highest leadership in the improbable American
experiment, thus inspiring all of us.
Throughout the first year of this campaign, against all predictions to
the contrary, we witnessed the hunger of the American people for
transcendence of racial identity. Iowans were receptive, and
confirmed capable leadership. In South Carolina, where the Confederate
Flag still flies for a rapidly declining few, we were embraced by the
majority who favored honest service by authentic representation.
This is not to say that race has not been an issue in the campaign. At
various stages in the campaign, some commentators have deemed me either
"too
black"
or "not
black
enough." We saw racial tensions bubble to the surface during the
week before the South Carolina primary. The press has scoured every exit
poll for the latest evidence of racial polarization, not just in terms
of
white and black,
but
black and brown
as well.
And yet, it has only been in the last couple of weeks that the
discussion of race in this campaign has taken a particularly divisive
turn.
On one end of the spectrum, we've heard the implication that my
candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it's based
solely on the desire of liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on
the cheap. On the other end, we've heard my former pastor, Reverend
Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express views that have the
potential not only to widen the racial divide, but denigrate both the
greatness and the goodness of our nation; that rightly offend
all Americans.
I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of
Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging
questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of
American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him
make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in
church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views?
Absolutely - just as I'm sure many of you have heard remarks from your
pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.
But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren't simply
controversial. They weren't simply a religious leader's effort to speak
out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a
profoundly distorted view of this country
- a view that sees
white racism
as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that
we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the
Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like
Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of
radical Islam.
As such, Reverend Wright's comments were not only wrong but divisive,
divisive at a time when we need
unity;
racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set
of monumental problems: two wars, a terrorist threat, a
falling economy, a chronic health care crisis, and potentially
devastating climate change; problems that are not racial, but rather
problems that confront us all.
Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals,
there will no doubt be those for whom my statements condemning my
minister are not enough. Why associate myself with Reverend Wright in
the first place, they may ask? Why not join another church? And I
confess that i would re-pledge my allegiance if all that I knew of
Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons we have multiply
seen, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures
being peddled by some commentators.
But the truth is, that isn't all that I know of the man. The man I met
more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my
Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one
another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor. He is a man who
served his country as a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at
some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country, and who
for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing
God's work here on Earth - by housing the homeless, ministering to the
needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison
ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS.
In my first book, Dreams From My Father, I described the experience of
my first service at Trinity:
"People began to shout, to rise from their seats and clap and cry out, a
forceful wind carrying the reverend's voice up into the rafters....And
in that single note - hope! - I heard something else; at the foot of
that cross, inside the thousands of churches across the city, I imagined
the stories of ordinary black people merging with the stories of David
and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians in the lion's den,
Ezekiel's field of dry bones. Those stories - of survival, and freedom,
and hope - became our story, my story; the blood that had spilled was
our blood, the tears our tears; until this black church, on this bright
day, seemed once more a vessel carrying the story of a people into
future generations and into a larger world. Our trials and triumphs
became at once unique and universal; in chronicling our journey, the
stories and songs gave us a means to reclaim memories that we didn't
need to feel shame...memories that all people might study and cherish -
and with which we could start to rebuild."
That has been my experience at Trinity. Like other predominantly
AfAm
churches across the country, Trinity embodies the
AfAm
community in its entirety - the doctor and the welfare mom, the model
student and the former gang-banger. Like other
AfAm
churches, Trinity's services are full of raucous laughter and sometimes
bawdy humor. They are full of dancing, clapping, screaming and shouting
that may seem jarring to the untrained ear. The church contains in full
the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking
ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness
and bias that make up the
AfAm
experience in America.
And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Reverend Wright.
As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He
strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children.
Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any
ethnic group in derogatory terms,
or treat anyone with other than
courtesy and
respect. He contains within him the contradictions - the good and the
bad - of the community that he has served diligently for so many years.
I can no more disown Reverend Wright than I can disown
my AfAm heritage.
I can no more disown him than I can disown my
EuAm
grandmother
- a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again
for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this
world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of
AfAm men
who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has
uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.
These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this
country that I love.
Some will see this as an attempt to justify or excuse comments that are
simply inexcusable. I can assure you it is not. I suppose the
politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just
hope that it fades into the woodwork. We can dismiss Reverend Wright as
a crank or a demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine Ferraro,
in the aftermath of her recent statements, as harboring some deep-seated
racial bias.
But race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore
right now. We would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made
in his offending sermons about America - to simplify and stereotype and
amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality.
The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that
have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race
in this country that we've never really worked through - a part of our
union that we have yet to perfect. And if we walk away now, if we simply
retreat into our respective corners, we will never be able to come
together and solve challenges like health care, or education, or the
need to find good jobs for every American.
Understanding this reality requires a reminder of how we arrived at this
point. As William Faulkner once wrote, "The past isn't dead and buried.
In fact, it isn't even past." We do not need to recite here the history
of racial injustice in this country. But we do need to remind ourselves
that so many of the disparities that exist in the
African-American
community today can be directly traced to inequalities passed on from an
earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and
Jim Crow.
Segregated schools were, and are, inferior schools; we still haven't
fixed them, fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education, and the
inferior education they provided, then and now, helps explain the
pervasive achievement gap between today's
AfAm
and
EuAm
students.
Legalized discrimination meant that
AfAm
families
could not amass any meaningful wealth to bequeath to future generations
- where
AfAms
were prevented, often through violence, from owning property, or loans
were not granted to
African-American business owners,
or
AfAm
homeowners
could not access FHA mortgages, or
AfAms
were excluded from unions, or the police force, or fire departments.
That history helps explain the wealth and income gap between
AfAm
and
EuAm,
and the concentrated pockets of poverty that persists in so many of
today's urban and rural communities.
A lack of economic opportunity among
AfAm
men,
and the shame and frustration that came from not being able to provide
for one's family, contributed to the erosion of
AfAm
families
- a problem that welfare policies for many years may have worsened.
And the lack of basic services in so many urban
AfAm
neighborhoods
-
parks for kids to play in, police walking the beat, regular garbage
pick-up and building code enforcement - all helped create a cycle of
violence, blight and neglect that continue to haunt us.
This is the reality in which Reverend Wright and other
African-Americans
of his generation grew up. They came of age in the late fifties and
early sixties, a time when segregation was still the law of the land and
opportunity was systematically constricted. What's remarkable is not how
many failed in the face of discrimination, but rather how many
men and women overcame
the odds; how many were able to make a way out of
no way
for those like me who would come after them.
But for all those who scratched and clawed their way to get a piece of
the American Dream, there were many who didn't make it - those who
ultimately
accepted defeat.
That legacy of defeat was passed on to future generations - those young
men and increasingly young women who we see standing on street corners
or languishing in our prisons, without hope or prospects for the future.
Even for those
AfAms
who did make it, questions of race, and racism, continue to define their
worldview in fundamental ways. For the men and women of Reverend
Wright's generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have
not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years. That
anger may not get expressed in public, in front of
EuAm
co-workers or friends.
But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table. At
times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along
racial lines, or to make up for a politician's own failings.
And occasionally it finds voice in the AfAm church on Sunday morning, in
the pulpit and in the pews. The fact that so many people are surprised
to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright's sermons simply reminds
us of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life
occurs on Sunday morning. That anger is not always productive;
indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems;
it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition,
and prevents the
African-American community
from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change. But the
anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it
without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of
misunderstanding that exists between the races.
In fact, a similar anger exists within segments of the
EuAm
community.
Most working- and middle-class
EuAm
Americans
don't feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race.
Their experience is the immigrant experience - as far as they're
concerned, no one's handed them anything, they've built it from scratch.
They've worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs
shipped overseas or their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor. They
are anxious about their futures, and feel their dreams slipping away; in
an era of stagnant wages and global competition, opportunity comes to be
seen as a zero sum game, in which your dreams come at my expense. So
when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; when
they hear that an
African American
is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good
college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed;
when they're told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods
are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time.
Like the anger within the
AfAm
community,
these resentments aren't always expressed in polite company. But they
have helped shape the political landscape for at least a generation.
Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan
Coalition, even while the primary focus was resolution of the cold war
nuclear threat from the Soviet Union.
Politicians
routinely exploited fears of crime for their own electoral ends. Talk
show hosts and conservative commentators built entire careers unmasking
bogus claims of racism while dismissing legitimate discussions of racial
injustice and inequality as mere political correctness or reverse
racism.
Just as
AfAm
anger
often proved counterproductive, so have these
EuAm
resentments
distracted attention from the
real culprits
of the middle class squeeze - a corporate culture rife with inside
dealing, questionable accounting practices, and short-term
greed;
a Washington dominated by lobbyists and special interests; economic
policies that favor the few over the many. And yet, to wish away
the resentments of
EuAms,
to label them as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are
grounded in legitimate concerns - this too widens the racial divide, and
blocks the path to understanding.
This is where we are right now. It's a
racial stalemate
we've been stuck in for years. Contrary to the claims of some of my
critics,
AfAm and EuAm,
I have never been so naïve as to believe that we can get beyond our
racial divisions in a single election cycle, or with a single candidacy
- particularly a candidacy as imperfect as my own.
But I have asserted a firm conviction - a conviction rooted in my faith
in God and my faith in the American people - that working together we
can move beyond some of our old racial wounds, and that in fact
we have no choice
if we are to continue on the path of a more perfect union.
For the
African-American community,
that path means embracing the burdens of our past without becoming
victims of our past. It means continuing to insist on a full measure of
justice in every aspect of American life. But it also means
binding our
particular
struggle
- for better health care, and better schools, and better jobs -
to the larger aspirations of all Americans
-- the
EuAm
woman
struggling to break the glass ceiling, the
EuAm
man
who has been laid off, the immigrant trying to feed his family. And it
means taking full responsibility for own lives - by demanding more from
our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and reading to
them, and teaching them that while they may face challenges and
discrimination in their own lives, they must never succumb to despair or
cynicism or defeat; they must always believe that they can endure; and
write their own destiny.
Ironically, this quintessentially American - and yes, conservative -
notion of self-help found frequent expression in Reverend Wright's
sermons. But what my former pastor too often failed to understand is
that embarking on a program of self-help also requires a belief that
society can change.
The profound mistake of Reverend Wright's sermons is not that he spoke
about racism in our society. It's that he spoke as if our society was
static; as if no progress has been made; as if this country is still
irrevocably bound to a tragic past -- a country that has made it
possible for one of his own
AfAm
members to run for the highest office in the land and build a coalition
of all Americans. But what we know, what we have witnessed, is
that
America can change.
That is the true genius of this nation. What we have already
achieved gives us hope - the
audacity to hope
- for what we can and must achieve tomorrow.
In the
EuAm
community,
the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the
African-American community
does not just exist in the minds of
AfAm
people;
that the legacy of discrimination - and current incidents of
discrimination, while less overt than in the past - are real and must be
addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds - by investing in
our schools and our communities; by enforcing our civil rights laws and
ensuring fairness in our criminal justice system; by providing this
generation with ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for
previous generations. It requires all Americans to realize that your
dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing
in the health, welfare, and education of
all children
will ultimately help all of America prosper.
In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less,
than what all great religions advise - that we do unto others as we
would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother's keeper, Scripture
tells us. Let us be our sister's keeper. Let us find that common spirit,
and let our politics reflect that spirit and respect that spirit with
integrity.
For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics
that exploits division and conflict, based on cynicism. We can
accept the yellow journalism of racial horse-race nightly news. We can
play Reverend Wright's sermons on every channel, every day and fan the
flames we know destroys our kindred love. We can do that.
But if we do, then my campaign has failed and nothing will change.
That is one option.
Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, "Not
this time." This time we want to talk about the crumbling schools that
are stealing the future of
our
children.
This time we reject the cynicism that tells us that these kids can't
learn; that kids who don't look like us are somebody else's problem.
All children of America are our kids, and we will not let them fall
behind in a 21st century economy. Not this time. We depend
on them for our elderly welfare.
This time we want to talk about how the lines in the Emergency Room are
filled with those who do not have health care; who don't have the
power on their own to overcome the special interests in Washington, but
who can take them on if we do it together.
This time we want to talk about the shuttered mills that once provided a
decent life for men and women of every race, and the homes for sale that
once belonged to Americans from every religion, every region, every walk
of life. This time we want to talk about the fact that the real problem
is not that someone who doesn't look like you might take your job; it's
that the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more
than a profit.
This time we want to talk about all men and women who serve together,
and fight together, and bleed together under the same proud flag.
We want to talk about how to bring them home from a war that never
should have been authorized and never should have been waged; and we
want to talk about how we'll show our patriotism by caring for them, and
their families, and giving them the benefits they have earned.
I would not be running for President if I didn't believe with all my
heart that this is what the vast majority of Americans want for this
country. This union may never be perfect, but generation after
generation has shown that it
can always be perfected.
And today, whenever I find myself feeling doubtful or cynical about this
possibility, what gives me the most hope is the next generation - the
young people whose attitudes and beliefs and openness to change have
already made history in this election.
There is one story in particularly that I'd like to leave you with today
- a story I told when I had the great honor of speaking on Dr. King's
birthday at his home church, Ebenezer Baptist, in Atlanta.
There is a young, twenty-three year old white woman named Ashley
Baia who organized for our campaign in Florence, South Carolina. She had
been working to organize a mostly
African-American community
since the beginning of this campaign, and one day she was at a
roundtable discussion where everyone went around telling their story and
why they were there.
And Ashley said that when she was nine years old, her mother got cancer.
And because she had to miss days of work, she was let go and lost her
health care. They had to file for bankruptcy, and that's when Ashley
decided that she had to do something to help her mom.
She knew that food was one of their most expensive costs, and so Ashley
convinced her mother that what she really liked and really wanted to eat
more than anything else was mustard and relish sandwiches. Because that
was the cheapest way to eat.
She did this for a year until her mom got better, and she told everyone
at the roundtable that the reason she joined our campaign was so that
she could help the millions of other children in the country who want
and need to help their parents too.
Now Ashley might have made a different choice. Perhaps somebody told her
along the way that the source of her mother's problems were
AfAms
who were on welfare and too lazy to work, or
HiAms
who were coming into the country illegally. But she didn't. She sought
out allies in her fight against injustice.
Anyway, Ashley finishes her story and then goes around the room and asks
everyone else why they're supporting the campaign. They all have
different stories and reasons. Many bring up a specific issue. And
finally they come to this elderly
AfAm man
who's been sitting there quietly the entire time. And Ashley asks
him why he's there. And he does not bring up a specific issue. He
does not say health care or the economy. He does not say education
or the war. He does not say that he was there because of Barack
Obama. He simply says to everyone in the room, "I am here because
of Ashley."
"I'm here because of Ashley." By itself, that single moment of
recognition between that
young EuAm girl
and that
old AfAm man
is not enough. It is not enough to give health care to the sick,
or jobs to the jobless, or education to our children.
But it is where we start. It is where our union grows stronger.
And as so many generations have come to realize over the course of the
two-hundred and twenty one years since a band of patriots signed that
document in Philadelphia, that is where the perfection begins.
|
|
|